Friday, March 9, 2012

On Our Soapbox: Puck Bunnies

Or How Sexism In Sports Will Never End.
by: Noodles



-&-

So, this one time I was on tumblr and saw a link to this Sports Illustrated article titled "NHL Puck Bunnies'.

You have no idea how mad it made me.

Here is the link to the gallery.

My favorite part of this piece of 'journalism' was this line:
Hockey fans come in all shapes and sizes, buy few are as passionate as the league's female fans (aka - Puck Bunnies)

I can forgive Sports Illustrated's ignorance on what exactly hockey is. This is America and hockey will always be the red-headed step child no matter what Bettman does.

What I can't forgive is how they use a derogatory word to describe all female hockey fans. And they use it cheerfully.

Do they not have fact-checkers up in their offices? Do they seriously think that all women who love the sport of hockey are 'puck bunnies'? Do they even know what a 'puck bunny' is?

It's just another example of how mainstream sports media in America has no idea about anything hockey-related. (Hockey is the hipster sport...we're kidding.)


That word angers me to begin with.

The word 'puck bunny' is used to describe a female who watches the sport of hockey solely to 'hook-up' with a player and because the players are hot.

It's a loaded term that is used by both sexes of fans to berate female fans of other teams, their teams or women who they just don't like at games. This term has to stop. It's vile and cruel and unnecessary.

Girls use it about other girls to make themselves feel better about being a fan. They use it when they are personally threatened by how a girl looks or how she dresses. Guys use it to feel superior about the sport. They use it to degrade the female fans.


Personally, I could not care less if you're a bandwagon fan, if you're a life-long fan, if you jump from team to team, if you're only here to bang the players.

I DO NOT CARE.

I am just thrilled that you decided to pay money to come see the game or watch it on the television. As long as your antics do not interrupt what I am doing or my enjoyment of the game, I don't care why you're there.

I know why I am a fan. I know where my loyalties lie. And that is all that matters. If you wanna bang every hockey player, go right ahead because I don't care and I am not going to stop you. It's your decision and it's your life and I am not going to judge you for it.


The issue here is how SI basically calls every female hockey fan by a name that is derogatory. Not every female fan is a 'puck-bunny'.

Do I find hockey players attractive?

OMG YES ABSOLUTELY!

HOW CAN I NOT?

It's like a dude watching the Victoria's Secret fashion show and not finding any of the girls attractive.

It's rare and it does happen but NOT VERY LIKELY.

So are these guys who find the models attractive called 'Lingerie-bunnies'? Why not? Let's get that trending.

Liking a hockey player because of how he looks should not be something we ridicule. You should make fun of your friend if they are drunk and admit that they like the trolliest-looking player. You shouldn't call a girl a 'puck-bunny' because she finds a player attractive.

How I think of it is this: if I knew this person in real life and if I was say in college with them, would I still find them attractive? If the answer is 'yes' then what does it matter? If I like the hockey player in question for his looks and for his skills then I hit the mother-load.


I am female.

I have lady-parts.

These lady-parts appreciate a pretty face.

Hockey players are attractive because they're built and they're toned and they're talented and they've got language like sailors and they're motivated and they're competitive and they're missing teeth.

So many reasons.

Have I ever watched a hockey game just for the sole purpose of watching a player I find attractive?

No, not really. There are certain teams that I only watch when one of my favorite teams are playing them. And you couldn't get me to watch these teams unless Ryan Whitney was traded there. Then I would think about it.

Admittedly, I barely watch Wild or Devils or Coyotes games unless there's a team I like playing them. Are there attractive players on those teams? Yeah. Zach 'universally pretty' Parise plays for the Devils and I can't even watch those games unless I have to. And Mikko Koivu is one of the best defensive forwards in the league and I still can't watch Wild games. Sorry, nothing against these teams but their playing styles are just not my cup of tea.

As a fan of hockey, I am in love with the game. I have done some crazy things to see a game. And it wasn't because the player that I think I have a chance of banging will be playing. It's because I love the sport. There is something about the quickness and the skill and the fast plays that are just amazing. I've been a hockey fan since I was six-years-old.

Does that make me better than other fans? No. I am sure that there are fans who just started watching hockey who know more than me. All that means is that I have been watching way too much hockey.


Now, back to the Sports Illustrated article.

The pictures are just terrible.

Granted, there are some in there that are of what people like to call 'puck-bunnies' and every girl knows who they are. But who cares? I don't care if you wanna bang Taylor Hall because he's pretty. I don't care if you wanna bang Taylor Hall because he's an amazing player who is an integral part of an up-and-coming team and reached 50 points for the first time in his young career.

If you wanna bang him, go for it.

Here's an example: I worship the ground that Jordan Eberle walks on. Why? Oh maybe because of this:

And I'm not even Canadian.

I can appreciate what this meant for hockey and for Canada and for the kids that were giving it their all in that game. LeTude and I were literally crying and holding each other in the living room watching this game.

Was I crying from joy because Jordan Eberle is SOOOOO HOTTTT? Come on. I was emotional because it was the biggest goal scored probably ever in WJC history. It was important and we understood that and were so happy that we got to witness it.

But the important question to ask is: if he approached me in a bar and wanted to bang me, would I do it?

Absolutely. I would let him bang me if I was a dude. Why? Because he's a Canadian hero and I would be honored that he would want to do it with me. Honored. And I would take one for the team because being American, I would totally get disowned by the country. And he's attractive in a dopey sort of way and he has a cute laugh.


Okay, back to the pictures. Let's analyze some of these.

More than likely puck-bunnies:






more than likely NOT puck-bunnies:






We hope you can tell the difference.

But the funny thing is, maybe the girl holding the 'Marry Me Ryan White' sign knows everything there is about hockey?

What if she knows more than the woman holding the sign that says 'Canucks Give Me 5-0th It's My Birthday' knows absolutely nothing about the sport.

We have to stop judging female fans by what they wear and by what they choose to put on signs.


Who cares?

Oh, apparently everyone.


These girls, no matter how much they know, give the rest of us female fans a bad name. And it sucks. We are already fighting an uphill battle and when male fans and other female fans decide to degrade the other women for making these stupid signs and dressing up for a game, you're kicking women back into the 18th century of sports fans.

This prejudice hurts all of us.

And that's why the word 'puck-bunny' has to stop.

I've been called a 'puck-bunny' many, many times. Mostly by men who thought that it was funny. I don't really care. I know what I know and I know why I watch the game. I feel sorry that these people have to put me down to feel better about themselves as fans.

As female fans, we should embrace the players that we love. Shout from the rooftops about how much you love Henrik Lundqvist or Kris Letang or Taylor Hall. Be proud that you not only find them attractive but you also can appreciate how they play and recite their stats, not because you have to but because you love stats.

I talk about my favorite hockey players all the time. I tell everyone how much I love Ryan Whitney. Do I care what people think of me? No. Sometimes he sucks. Sometimes he has the amazing passes that still make me weep. And most of the time I just love his face.

On this blog alone, we definitely objectify the hockey players that we want. We make up dates and list them in order of who is the hottest. We're allowed because it's the American way and it's a free country. And we have the smarts to back up what we say.

99% of female hockey fans have that one player that they love only because of his looks. It happens. But then there's that player that you love no matter what because of his playing. It could be because he's a master shot-blocker or because he plays with the most passion you've ever seen or because he has this disgusting backhand that gets you all riled up.

We're lucky to be able to see both the skill and the talent while also appreciating the looks of these guys.


If you have to use the word 'puck-bunny' then use it properly.

Use it for a girl who is truly after the players because they're young, rich and attractive. Use it for the girls who go to games and waste their money because they think that they will get the hockey player of her choice to bang her.

That's why the word 'puck-bunny' was invented. So use it properly or not at all.

And we're looking at you, Sports Illustrated.

-&-

Let us know what you think.

Also, here is another, better analysis of the article here by Emma Harger.

Check out her take.

13 comments:

Michelle said...

Noodles, you did a DAMN good job on this post. Puck Daddy should pick it up. You hit it on the head when you said we're lucky to see the skill and talent as well as appreciate the looks. Didn't realize that liking guys and liking hockey had to be mutually exclusive.

This is the e-mail I just sent to SI.

Dear SI -
I am a married, professional woman who also happens to be a huge fan of the NHL as well as a former hockey player. None of the aforementioned makes me a puck bunny, and I severely disapprove of the insinuation in your "Puck Bunnies" gallery that all female hockey fans are in it for a chance at sex with players. Certainly, the decision to publish that gallery shows a dearth of good sense at best and malicious misogyny at worst. Thankfully, your publications cover hockey on such a superficial level that I do not need to ever purchase another SI magazine. Readers can get better coverage, without clearly institutional sexism, from The Hockey News.
How disappointing in the year 2012.

Noodles and Henrik said...

Michelle:

Boom. That is a lovely email and I hope they get slammed by female and male fans all over the country.

Esbee said...

@Noodles Awesome post.*ovation*

@Michelle I WILL be sending an email to Sports Illustrated myself. Yours is great. I am furious over this. Just because I am hockey fan that has a vagina does not make me a puck bunny. SO glad they did this around International Women's Day. Way to go!

I spent lunch today listening to coworkers talk about how all women are bad drivers. I am just feeling the love as a woman this week!

I am so tired of fighting for respect. SO tired. It seems like at least ONE person that works for SI would have realized that term is derogatory. Oh wait. I am getting the feeling that maybe they just did not care.

I labeled 2012 as the Year of the Misogynist a couple of weeks ago. Sadly it has gotten worse since I first said it. I feel like making t-shirts that say that. I guess I better make them pink since I am a girl.

Esbee said...

Oh Hockey Broad also wrote a great post on it today. I think Puck Daddy picked it up.

http://www.hockeybroad.com/2012/03/dear-si-not-all-female-hockey-fans-are.html

Snowdrop said...

Well said! That article just pissed me off and made me sad at the same time. No matter how much progress we make it seems like there is always and article or something to slam us back into this "puck bunny" sexist way of viewing women who like sports as either lesbians or puck bunnies, there seems to be no in between.

Yes, some women are in it for the attractive players, but who cares? I don't they pay to go to the games don't they, they can get what they want out of it. I don't really care, I'm not here to judge, but I do get tried of being called a puck bunny because I find a man attractive.

I know of plenty of women who know more about hockey than I can imagine ever knowing. Others who know nothing but just recently discovered how much fun it is. And on the flip side I know men who know jack shit about it and like to pretend they do.

AussieGal said...

Hear, Hear!

Can't anyone who enjoys hockey just be called a fan regardless of gender? apparently not according to SI.I've copped a fair bit for being a Pens fan, yes I love Sid but that's not the sole reason why I like the Pens or hockey. I love hockey for the skill, speed and pace.

It just shits me to tears that we all get chucked into the same puck bunny basket just because we're in the stands cheering our teams on.

The hockey season is about to start here in Aus and god help any man in the stands who gives me a hard time for wearing a Pens jersey, I may just rip some sexist creep a new one!

Mimi said...

Well put Noodles!

I don't live in North America, so I don't get to go to the games or even watch them in genereal because of the time difference. Nor am I a devoted fan of any NHL team. I have my preferences but I can't say I only have one favourite team. That's partly beacase I don't get to see that many games and partly because I love hockey. Pure and simple. So I watch any game I can, no matter what the teams are. If it's a Penguins, Ducks or Habs game, even better but if it's Kings vs. Isles, I'll watch it. Mostly because Tavares has seriously wicked hands.. oh boy..

And yes, Tavares happens to have a very pretty face. So that's nice.. But honestly, you can't even see the players when the game is on. Their faces, bodies.. they're pretty covered. So no, I don't watch the Isles because Tavares is hot since that would be 2½ hours of my time wasted for just a few seconds of seeing his face. No. I watch the games for his hands. For his talent.

I watch a lot of sports and usually guys, when they hear that, give that sort of a cheesy smile thing, as in suggesting 'oh, so you like the players'. Doesn't matter which sports. Goddamnit, yes, Toews gets me bothered and hot but his looks don't even compare to how I think of him when he's on the ice. The dedication, the talent, the leadership, the pure desire to win... now that's why I appreciate the man. Those brown eyes and nice butt, they're a nice addition to package.

I got to see my first ever NHL about 2 months ago while visiting Montreal. I bought the tickets in September to make sure I there, paid 170 CAD for them because I know I wont be seeing an NHL game in Bell Centre for a long time, if ever. I went there alone because my local friend afford the tickets. But I didn't care. Because I timed my trip to Canada to see hockey. Summer would probably be a better choice to visit Canada when you're not into winter as it but there's no NHL games in the summer. And I sat there, on the 16th row right at the center line, on my own, happier than a 4 year old on a Christmas morning. Growing up as a Habs fan (not ever having watched their games even on TV), it was amazing. Lars Eller scored 4 goals, one on a penalty shot, Hal Gill fought.. It was amazing. Everytime anyone asks me which was the best part of my 17 days long Canada trip, I say it was the Habs-Jets game on Jan 4th. And no, there's no one I'd really like to 'do' in either Habs or Jets.

Rant over, never mind me..

Gems22 said...

I love hockey first and occasionally appreciate the beauties that play it. Thank you for this post because a female hockey fan is most definitely NOT a puck bunny. So what if I say Henrik Lundqvist is a looker; I've seen plenty men do that too. Guys comment on WAGs all the time but if I ever comment on a hockey player being hot, their inference is that I know nothing about the game and am only in it for the hotties.
The worst thing is that they don't consider this term derogatory toward real female hockey fans i.e. Paul Bissonette's Dr. Paul videos use the term to describe a 'female hockey fan' which is not true.

Thanks again and hope they get the message.

MouthGuard said...

My first reaction to the story and to the ensuing angry commentary was "Well, SI has officially jumped the shark and gone Bleacher Report." Sure enough, Puck Daddy said the same today: "Sports Illustrated decided to get all Bleacher Reporty..."

It's beyond bullshit - I don't even get how people can READ SI anymore these days. Isn't it a lingerie catalog or homophobic toilet paper? I'm so glad reading on the toilet makes me dizzy so I don't have to bother.

To be honest, just look at how long it's taken for a project like You Can Play to get off the ground... I don't want to minimize any of this, but if professional athletes and fans of their sports still have to adjust to the notion of appreciating (predominantly male) players for their talent, skill and integrity - rather than their sexual preference - why does it come as a surprise and a huge disappointment that a feature as blatantly dumb, degrading and unprofessional still happens in 2012?

My point is, changing society's outdated preconceptions takes a lot - a LOT - of time. I have said it before, but people of all shapes, sizes and genders/gender preferences go to hockey games for a whole bunch of interesting and surprising reasons. All of those reasons should be all good. But there will continue to be party-poopers who will ruin it for you: The insecure (and possibly gay) men who overcompensate by wanting players to be macho and want for arenas to be boys' clubs. Perhaps they are extra-hostile toward women because they don't want their own player fantasies to be ruined by the idea of women getting more face-time with their heroes than they do. And there will always be stupid shits who are distracting but again - it's a social, public gathering and we live in free countries (Canada, U.S., Australia, etc.) where you can be a jackass in public and pretty much get away with it.

Puck bunnies and jocks (cheerleader bunnies - suckers for jiggly party queens at sports events) are jackasses. I'm not sure that people will ever NOT go to sports events to score (just generally), but what are you going to do when sports franchises continue to employ (!) "dancers" and pander to sexually-inept and/or frustrated people by assuming that okay they like sports but the real reason they showed up was to pick somebody up or get their rocks off to the players and/or "dancers."

It's gonna take a while. Let's stay mad, but mostly let's just hold firm to our dignity and remember that hockey is fun and this fucking bullshit is not going to take from our right to play and attend games and to be who we are. Whatever the fuck that is.

Jay said...

I wouldn't have heard of this "article" if it hadn't been for this post--that's how relevant Sports Illustrated is to my life. SI is horribly sexist; they slap a model in a bikini on the cover once a year, even though SHE'S A MODEL AND NOT EVEN AN ATHLETE, which has nothing to do with sports. And the magazine is called Sports Illustrated. So can we really expect anything different from SI?

And how can we expect anything different from a magazine when the teams in the NHL do nothing but perpetuate the idea of a puck bunny? The girls in the ice crew skate around in skimpy little outfits so the men in the stands can ogle them. And let's face it, that's exactly what they're there for. I always assumed that teams with spotty fanbases were the ones who had ice girls in order to lure more men into the stands--but that's not true anymore, because look at Chicago. Look at Pittsburgh. They have girls in tight outfits, bare midriffs, and/or miniskirts that parade out onto the ice. These towns are known for their rabid fans, and yet they dress these girls scantily. And it is for the men in the stands, because I've been in the stands and have heard the comments men make toward those girls. (But if I talk about a player to my companion, and someone overhears me say, "Ooh, and he's pretty, too," that makes me the objectifier). But, of course, the men are in baggy, jersey-type shirts and pants. I hate this because I find it objectifying. I don't fault the girls who audition, because I like to think that they just want to be a part of "their" team. But I do fault the teams for conceiving it. Oh, and don't even get me started on pink jerseys. I hate them, and I will never change my mind on that topic. If you're supporting your team, you should wear their colors, not just sport the logo in pink. Ugh, sorry. For the record, I don't like the St. Patty's Day collection either, even though I love green.

And then there are teams like the Stars, who employ ice girls and dress them in teeny tiny shirts, who then promptly promote their "Hockey and Heels" event, which is designed to entice women into diehard fandom. Great! Expand your fanbase, because that is what is going to make your team more money. I'm fine with that. And I'm fine with the tag "Hockey and Heels" because it is possible to be feminine and still be into this "manly" sport. I'm not okay with the fact that you include in this night's festivities a "hockey 101" segment. Really? That's demeaning. Thanks, Dallas. If you want to cater to women, then stop treating us like we're idiots, and show us some respect!

I'll admit that I can be guilty in labeling girls as puck bunnies. It seems like every game I've ever gone to, in any arena, I hear girls ask the guy they came with, "So, what's icing?" and I can't help but roll my eyes at them. From here on out, though, I'll do better to stop that, since it hurts my cause as a female fan to degrade my fellow women in the stands.

MouthGuard said...

@Jay - Your points about the franchises employing jiggly party queens for oglers are very well taken. It ties in with what I was saying about how it's a very complicated, deep-seated societal issue that goes way beyond SI, hockey or the term "puck bunny."

Unless and until players - PLAYERS - demand better at their place of work it's not going to change anytime soon. It's technically a form of sexual harassment in the workplace. Being privy to sexual harassment is the same as being the target of it. Hockey players have to "work" in these arenas. They can and should tell their employers that they've had enough: No more ice girls. No more stupid shit going down in the stands. Home and visitor fans who start shit and harass fans for any reason other than "your team sucks and I hope they lose" should be ejected by venue staff. Venues and franchises perpetuate and are responsible for this type of unfriendly environment at games. Nobody should be made to feel uncomfortable at games because of their gender, gender preference, race, religion, creed or choice of footwear. If You Can Play continues to succeed and make people talk about a taboo issue the way it has, there might be potential to take the concept further and apply it to the way society conditions us to view women inside and outside sports.

And all that fugly-ass merchandising targeted at women - specifically, to make them feel prettier/sexier wearing team clothing? The sad reality is that sports marketing and merchandising are the areas in sports that tend to be well-staffed (even dominated) by women. They willingly perpetuate the bullshit and want you to buy into the stereotyping even more. So if you feel like you're being had/patronized, don't forget that you're likely being had BY A WOMAN who doesn't really care if you wear a team's babydoll-fit jersey. She wants you to THINK you're a good fan because you've spent too much money on and you're wearing a team's babydoll that makes you look and feel good because really all you want to do is look good at a hockey game because you're a stupid. plastic bimbo who doesn't understand or care about sports anyway and you go to games to pick somebody up and ogle players.

I hope this just pissed everybody off even more. Because I'm beyond incensed. But it's not going to ruin my love for the game and it's not going to keep me from attending hockey games. Fuckers!

Esbee said...

@mouthguard I JUST wrote a post today on how You Can Play is great but for some reason it's still ok to insult and objectify women fans. On the same page with you Mouthguard.

Jessi said...

Wow, thank you so, so much for writing this. Your story reminded me so much of myself and how I feel about the situation.
I am a girl who loves hockey too... A shy, innocent girl who would never think a naughty thought about the players, other than giggling if my friend says someone is cute.
But I was really starting to get worried that I was being viewed as the eponymous "Puck Bunny" as weil, just because I am a young, single, 22 year old woman.
I really hate being judged that way. I show up to the games to have fun, have some drinks, enjoy being a part of the crowd railing on fans of the opposing team and arguing about why our team is the best.
Needless to say, if I had the opportunity to date one of the players, of course I would be glad. I just like guys in general, no matter what they do for a living. I'll admire a pretty face wherever I see it.
Does that make me a "puck bunny?" Is SI's idea to scare all women away from going to the stadium?
Serious...